Prediction of Lauren Davis [191st] vs Jamie Loeb [476th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
L W W L L L W L W L
Form
L W W L W W W W W LH2H: Davis 2 - 1 Loeb
They have played 8 sets in total, with Davis winning 5 and Loeb winning 3. The last match between Davis and Loeb was at the Credit One Charleston Open - Charleston, 01-04-2025, First, Clay with Lauren Davis getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lauren Davis | 2 |
Jamie Loeb | 1 |
Davis | Stats | Loeb |
---|---|---|
54% (7-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (20-9) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
191 | Ranking | 476 |
26 | Highest Rank | 132 |
31 | Age | 30 |
R | Plays | R |
10 | Titles | 11 |
56% (386-300) | Career Total W/L | 54% (319-271) |
$2,979,674 | Career Prize Money | $226,266 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-1 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Lauren Davis
Player
Jamie Loeb
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
6-4 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Lauren Davis
Player
Jamie Loeb
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
6-2 2-6 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Jamie Loeb
Player
Lauren Davis
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
44%
(
33 of
75)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
5 | Sets Won | 3 |
38 | Games Won | 31 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
12 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:48:13 | Average Match Time | 1:48:13 |
53% (110/208) | 1st Serve % | 65% (140/215) |
65% (71/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (76/140) |
47% (46/98) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (31/75) |
57% (17/30) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 62% (13/21) |
50% (108/215) | Return Points Win % | 44% (91/208) |
67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lauren Davis vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Davis 2 - 1 Loeb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Davis has won 42.77% of points on their second serve, while Loeb has won 39.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Davis, in recent form, has won 46.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 51.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.82% and 33.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Davis has saved 50.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 51.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Davis has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 24/ 22), with Loeb winning 46.3% (W/L 25/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Davis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 35/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 51% (W/L 37/ 36). Loeb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 188/ 142), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 8/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Davis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 20/ 10), where as Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46% of matches (W/L 23/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Davis winning 2 times and Loeb being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Davis winning 5 and Loeb winning 3. The last match between Davis and Loeb was at the Credit One Charleston Open - Charleston, 01-04-2025, First, Clay with Lauren Davis getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Davis and Loeb have played a deciding set 2 times, with Davis winning 1 times and Loeb 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Davis winning 0, and Loeb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Davis has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.85 while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 403.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Davis has won 73% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Davis has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 41.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Lauren Davis Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Lauren Davis
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lauren Davis
Player
Jamie Loeb
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Lauren Davis
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
12
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lauren Davis
Player
Aoi Ito
55%
(
64 of
116)
1st Serve %
74%
(
77 of
104)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
26 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Lauren Davis
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ena Shibahara
Player
Lauren Davis
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Carson Branstine
Player
Lauren Davis
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lauren Davis
Player
Eva Vedder
83%
(
57 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lauren Davis
Player
Ximena Senties
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF | 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H |
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Jamie Loeb
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
0
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jamie Loeb
Player
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jamie Loeb
Player
Maria Mateas
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jamie Loeb
Player
Madison Sieg
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
12
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jamie Loeb
Player
Rhiann Newborn
44%
(
27 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lauren Davis
Player
Jamie Loeb
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jamie Loeb
Player
Eri Hozumi
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jamie Loeb
Player
Mei Yamaguchi
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Davis vs Loeb?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Davis Vs Loeb is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56% (386/300) | Win/Loss | 54% (319/271) |
54% (856/741) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (728/634) |
51% (7471/7106) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6399/6071) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
766 | Aces Total | 1454 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
1980 | Total Double Faults | 1691 |
1:26:30 | Average Match Time | 1:18:4 |
389.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 499.11 |
61% (24664/40506) | 1st Serve % | 54% (17158/31796) |
61% (15110/24664) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (11131/17158) |
45% (7180/15842) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6738/14637) |
48% (2370/4951) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1733/3690) |
45% (18401/40867) | Return Points Win % | 44% (14141/32408) |
56% (378/672) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (315/584) |
40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
60% (93/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (53/117) |
62% (143/230) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (91/182) |
85% (344/293) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (338/282) |
15% (344/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (338/55) |
27% (341/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (252/37) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...